[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110118212056.GK27946@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:20:56 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>,
Chad Talbott <ctalbott@...gle.com>,
Nauman Rafique <nauman@...gle.com>,
Divyesh Shah <dpshah@...gle.com>, jmoyer@...hat.com,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6 v3] cfq-iosched: Introduce cfq_entity for CFQ group
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 04:50:51PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
[..]
> -static struct cfq_group *cfq_rb_first_group(struct cfq_rb_root *root)
> +static struct cfq_entity *cfq_rb_first_entity(struct cfq_rb_root *root)
> {
> if (!root->left)
> root->left = rb_first(&root->rb);
>
> if (root->left)
> - return rb_entry_cfqg(root->left);
> + return rb_entry_entity(root->left);
>
Why are we defining cfq_rb_first_entity(). Can't we simply use cfq_rb_first()
as introduced in first patch.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists