lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110119090011.GD6197@m-desktop>
Date:	Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:30:12 +0530
From:	"G, Manjunath Kondaiah" <manjugk@...com>
To:	Thomas Weber <weber@...science.de>
Cc:	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Morsing <daniel.morsing@...il.com>, charu@...com,
	sshtylyov@...sta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/4] OMAP3: Devkit8000: Check return value of
 gpio_request

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:19:25AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> The return value of gpio_request is ignored.
> This patch adds the check of the return value of gpio_request.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weber <weber@...science.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c |   16 ++++++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c
> index 9fb416b..4ddd81c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c
> @@ -234,6 +234,8 @@ static struct gpio_led gpio_leds[];
>  static int devkit8000_twl_gpio_setup(struct device *dev,
>  		unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio)
>  {
> +	int ret;
> +
>  	omap_mux_init_gpio(29, OMAP_PIN_INPUT);
>  	/* gpio + 0 is "mmc0_cd" (input/IRQ) */
>  	mmc[0].gpio_cd = gpio + 0;
> @@ -244,13 +246,23 @@ static int devkit8000_twl_gpio_setup(struct device *dev,
>  
>  	/* TWL4030_GPIO_MAX + 0 is "LCD_PWREN" (out, active high) */
>  	devkit8000_lcd_device.reset_gpio = gpio + TWL4030_GPIO_MAX + 0;
> -	gpio_request(devkit8000_lcd_device.reset_gpio, "LCD_PWREN");
> +	ret = gpio_request(devkit8000_lcd_device.reset_gpio, "LCD_PWREN");
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to request GPIO for LCD_PWRN\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* Disable until needed */
>  	gpio_direction_output(devkit8000_lcd_device.reset_gpio, 0);
>  
>  	/* gpio + 7 is "DVI_PD" (out, active low) */
>  	devkit8000_dvi_device.reset_gpio = gpio + 7;
> -	gpio_request(devkit8000_dvi_device.reset_gpio, "DVI PowerDown");
> +	ret = gpio_request(devkit8000_dvi_device.reset_gpio, "DVI PowerDown");
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to request GPIO for DVI PowerDown\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}

Nak. Why you want this change as seperate patch? Merge this with 1/4

-Manjunath
[...]

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ