linux-kernel - Re: Bug in scheduler when using rt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1295441881.11678.41.camel@kolo>
Date:	Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:58:01 +0200
From:	Onkalo Samu <samu.p.onkalo@...ia.com>
To:	ext Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Onkalo Samu.P" <samu.p.onkalo@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in scheduler when using rt_mutex

On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:30 +0100, ext Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 11:38 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > Hrm, I think the to bit is not needed with the from thing in place, the
> > enqueue from _setprio will already have added min_vruntime
> 
> 
> Would lead to something like this:
> 

Doesn't work in my case.

> ---
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -8108,6 +8108,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__might_sleep);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ
>  static void normalize_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>  {
> +	struct sched_class *prev_class = p->sched_class;
> +	int old_prio = p->prio;
>  	int on_rq;
>  
>  	on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
> @@ -8118,6 +8120,8 @@ static void normalize_task(struct rq *rq
>  		activate_task(rq, p, 0);
>  		resched_task(rq->curr);
>  	}
> +
> +	check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, old_prio, task_current(rq, p));
>  }
>  
>  void normalize_rt_tasks(void)
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -4066,11 +4066,30 @@ static void prio_changed_fair(struct rq
>  		check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0);
>  }
>  
> +static void
> +switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int running)
> +{
> +	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> +	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Ensure the task's vruntime is normalized, so that when its
> +	 * switched back to the fair class the enqueue_entity(.flags=0) will
> +	 * do the right thing.
> +	 *
> +	 * If it was on_rq, then the dequeue_entity(.flags=0) will already
> +	 * have normalized the vruntime, if it was !on_rq, then only when
> +	 * the task is sleeping will it still have non-normalized vruntime.
> +	 */
> +	if (!se->on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
> +		se->vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * We switched to the sched_fair class.
>   */
> -static void switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
> -			     int running)
> +static void
> +switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int running)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * We were most likely switched from sched_rt, so
> @@ -4163,6 +4182,7 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sch
>  	.task_fork		= task_fork_fair,
>  
>  	.prio_changed		= prio_changed_fair,
> +	.switched_from		= switched_from_fair,
>  	.switched_to		= switched_to_fair,
>  
>  	.get_rr_interval	= get_rr_interval_fair,
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/