[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D370902.2020501@panasas.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:53:38 +0200
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fs/direct-io.c: don't try to allocate more than BIO_MAX_PAGES
in a bio
On 01/19/2011 04:34 AM, David Dillow wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 16:53 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> Well. -stable only needs the patch if the driver which triggers the
>> problem is also there. But we don't know what driver that is, yet???
>
> Good point.
>
> Any driver that supports a sg_tablesize of more than 256 has the
> potential for problems. A quick search of the tree indicates that the
> following set their initial sg_tablesize to SCSI_MAX_SG_CHAIN_SEGMENTS
> (2048), though they may be saved by a separate bug I found -- and sent a
> patch to the list -- that incorrectly causes that define to take the
> value 128.
>
> ./drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
> ./drivers/scsi/arm/powertec.c
> ./drivers/scsi/arm/eesox.c
> ./drivers/scsi/arm/cumana_2.c
> ./drivers/ata/pata_icside.c
>
<snip>
iscsi has it on 2048 since ever
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists