[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8yaaaiwsstw.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:31:55 -0800
From: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
To: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>
Cc: Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rlove@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: msm: Add support for UARTDM cores
On Wed, Jan 19 2011, Jamie Iles wrote:
>> @@ -38,9 +40,20 @@ struct msm_port {
>> struct uart_port uart;
>> char name[16];
>> struct clk *clk;
>> + struct clk *pclk;
>> unsigned int imr;
>> + unsigned int *gsbi_base;
>> + int is_dm;
>> + unsigned int old_snap_state;
>> };
>
> Out of interest, what does .is_dm mean? Is that obvious to someone who
> knows about msm?
It would be clear to people rather familiar with the chip, but I agree
it's probably not that clear of a name.
We have two UART blocks we use in the MSMs, the older one, supported by
this driver before this change, and a newer one that was designed to
work with our DMA engine (known as the Data Mover, or dm). This newer
UART can be used in a somewhat compatible manner when being used for
serial-port type operations.
I'm not sure what would be a better name for the flag, though. The
block is called UARTDM.
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists