[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1295460822.12215.1389.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:13:42 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, richm@...elvet.org.uk,
609371@...s.debian.org, ben@...adent.org.uk,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Bug#609371: linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-sparc64: module scsi_mod:
Unknown relocation: 36
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 11:15 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@...dmis.org) wrote:
> > After applying David's "remove align" patch, I got it to boot on x86_64
> > with the following two patches. I thought just adding the "align" to the
> > structure declaration would work, but it still failed on the syscall for
> > init_module. By removing the double "declaration" of event_exit_##sname,
> > removed this problem.
> >
> > I'll test this on x86 32bit and PPC 64. If it works there, I'll push all
> > of them out for 38. Should these go to 37 stable too?
>
> Please hold before adding these patches into git. They don't seem to address the
> underlying problem correctly. See the latest exchanges between David Miller and
> myself for more info.
>
> We need to come up with something better than "it boots" as an explanation for
> the fix.
Yes, I agree that we should solve this issue correctly. But if there is
a work around to the problem, we could implement that if the real
solution is not in our grasp yet.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists