| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <8ya7he0r7rx.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:52:02 -0800 From: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org> To: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com> Cc: Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@...eaurora.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rlove@...gle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: msm: Add support for UARTDM cores On Wed, Jan 19 2011, Jamie Iles wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:31:55AM -0800, David Brown wrote: >> I'm not sure what would be a better name for the flag, though. The >> block is called UARTDM. > > Ok, it was mainly out of curiosity. I guess it could be 'use_dma' or > perhaps a comment to explain what DM is but my curiosity is now > satisfied ;-) I think use_dma would probably be even more confusing, since it isn't using dma. It's a flag indicating if the device has the capability of doing dma. It's really a block version indicator, except that the blocks weren't given different versions, but instead given a name based on the DMA. I wonder if is_dma_capable would be better. David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists