[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110119.142348.186319799.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:23:48 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, richm@...elvet.org.uk, 609371@...s.debian.org,
ben@...adent.org.uk, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Bug#609371: linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-sparc64: module scsi_mod:
Unknown relocation: 36
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:21:44 -0500
> I still wonder how a 32-bit system can generate an unaligned access trap for an
> access to a 64-bit variable aligned on 32-bit, given that there is, by
> definition, no 64-bit memory accesses available on the architecture ?
Sparc 32-bit (and I believe MIPS 32-bit as well) have such 64-bit
load and store instructions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists