[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D37F2C9.8000906@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:31:05 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: percpu related boot crash on x86
On 1/20/11 1:11 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar<mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
>> Btw., based on Peter's suggestion i tried the limit-bumping hack below - but it
>> did not help, the crash still triggers on 5%-10% of all randconfig bootups.
>
> I'm now running tests with MAXSMP forcibly disabled - and there are no crashes after
> 69 randconfig iteration. Before it would crash within 10 iterations.
>
> So it seems the MAXSMP sizing tests triggers a new percpu regression.
It needs CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC to trigger. As the comment in
vmap_debug_free_range() already says "it's going to be slow" I wonder if
we could just hack around the problem by adding a
if (!irqs_disabled())
guard around the debugging code to make vfree() always work with IRQs
disabled.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists