linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] MIPS: perf: Add support for 64-bit perf counters.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:48:53 -0800
From:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To:	Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@...il.com>
CC:	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] MIPS: perf: Add support for 64-bit perf counters.

On 01/20/2011 02:06 AM, Deng-Cheng Zhu wrote:
> 2011/1/7 David Daney<ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>:
>> @@ -294,14 +519,29 @@ static void mipspmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
>>
>>   static void mipspmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
>>   {
>> -       if (mipspmu)
>> -               mipspmu->start();
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMP
>> +       write_unlock(&pmuint_rwlock);
>> +#endif
>> +       resume_local_counters();
>>   }
>
> When working with CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMP, the compiler says 'pmuint_rwlock
> undeclared' because of its improper place of definition.
>

OK, I will try to fix it.


>
>> @@ -1550,10 +1462,30 @@ init_hw_perf_events(void)
>>                 return -ENODEV;
>>         }
>>
>> -       if (mipspmu)
>> -               pr_cont("%s PMU enabled, %d counters available to each "
>> -                       "CPU, irq %d%s\n", mipspmu->name, counters, irq,
>> -                       irq<  0 ? " (share with timer interrupt)" : "");
>> +       mipspmu.num_counters = counters;
>> +       mipspmu.irq = irq;
>> +
>> +       if (read_c0_perfctrl0()&  M_PERFCTL_WIDE) {
>> +               mipspmu.max_period = (1ULL<<  63) - 1;
>> +               mipspmu.valid_count = (1ULL<<  63) - 1;
>> +               mipspmu.overflow = 1ULL<<  63;
>> +               mipspmu.read_counter = mipsxx_pmu_read_counter_64;
>> +               mipspmu.write_counter = mipsxx_pmu_write_counter_64;
>> +               counter_bits = 64;
>> +       } else {
>> +               mipspmu.max_period = (1ULL<<  32) - 1;
>> +               mipspmu.valid_count = (1ULL<<  31) - 1;
>> +               mipspmu.overflow = 1ULL<<  31;
>> +               mipspmu.read_counter = mipsxx_pmu_read_counter;
>> +               mipspmu.write_counter = mipsxx_pmu_write_counter;
>> +               counter_bits = 32;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       on_each_cpu(reset_counters, (void *)(long)counters, 1);
>> +
>> +       pr_cont("%s PMU enabled, %d %d-bit counters available to each "
>> +               "CPU, irq %d%s\n", mipspmu.name, counters, counter_bits, irq,
>> +               irq<  0 ? " (share with timer interrupt)" : "");
>>
>>         perf_pmu_register(&pmu);
>>
>
> perf_pmu_register(&pmu) should be now changed to perf_pmu_register(&pmu,
> "cpu", PERF_TYPE_RAW).

Yes, I already have that locally.

David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/