[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D37A016.8060902@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:38:14 -0800
From: Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@...eaurora.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
davidb@...eaurora.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, rlove@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: msm: Add support for UARTDM cores
On 1/19/2011 2:24 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 02:08:29PM -0800, Stepan Moskovchenko wrote:
>>>> + /* Mask conditions we're ignorning. */
>>>> + sr&= port->read_status_mask;
>>>> + if (sr& UART_SR_RX_BREAK)
>>>> + flag = TTY_BREAK;
>>>> + else if (sr& UART_SR_PAR_FRAME_ERR)
>>>> + flag = TTY_FRAME;
>>> It doesn't look like the flag is used anywhere after it has been
>>> assigned.
>> An artifact of an old driver. Removed.
> But still required to support proper error signalling.
>
On second thought, from poking around the kernel some more, I believe
the following should be a better approach:
if (sr & UART_SR_RX_BREAK) {
tty_insert_flip_char(tty, 0, TTY_BREAK);
} else if (sr & UART_SR_PAR_FRAME_ERR) {
tty_insert_flip_char(tty, 0, TTY_FRAME);
}
Russell, what do you think? Shall I make the change in v2?
Thanks
Steve
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists