[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201101200848.25141.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:48:24 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 18 (__modver_version_show)
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:42:19 am Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:17:49 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm seeing this on several builds (i386 and x86_64):
> >>>
> >>> lib/built-in.o:(__modver+0x8): undefined reference to `__modver_version_show'
> >>> lib/built-in.o:(__modver+0x2c): undefined reference to `__modver_version_show'
...
> You hit the nail. They do not have SYSFS enabled.
Thanks, does this fix it?
Thanks,
Rusty.
module: fix linker error for MODULE_VERSION when !MODULE and CONFIG_SYSFS=n
lib/built-in.o:(__modver+0x8): undefined reference to `__modver_version_show'
lib/built-in.o:(__modver+0x2c): undefined reference to `__modver_version_show'
Simplest to just not emit anything: if they've disabled SYSFS they probably
want the smallest kernel possible.
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
--- a/include/linux/module.h
+++ b/include/linux/module.h
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ extern struct module __this_module;
local headers in "srcversion".
*/
-#ifdef MODULE
+#if defined(MODULE) || !defined(CONFIG_SYSFS)
#define MODULE_VERSION(_version) MODULE_INFO(version, _version)
#else
#define MODULE_VERSION(_version) \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists