[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=NU=ANUDGGdiCL+AP696nF1kXwPHOPZPrCti2u@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:30:57 +0800
From: Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert.chuang@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ratbert@...aday-tech.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, dilinger@...ued.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: add Faraday FTMAC100 10/100 Ethernet driver
Dear Joe,
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 17:40 +0800, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
>> Well, TBH, I don't like this style because if I changed the
>> function name, the indentation might need to be adjusted.
>
> No worries. That could happen using either style.
>
> There's no required style so you can use what you are
> most comfortable doing. It's not a big deal at all.
>
>> Even worse, I got an infeasible case :-(
>>
>> static struct ftmac100_rxdes *ftmac100_rx_locate_first_segment(
>> struct ftmac100 *priv)
>>
>> I know my function names are quite long, but I like them to be descriptive.
>> Do you really insist on it?
>
> Here's a common alternative style for this case:
>
> static struct ftmac100_rxdes *
> ftmac100_rx_locate_first_segment(struct ftmac100 *priv)
OK, I see.
One more question: how to deal with this? Add a local variable for the
2nd argument?
ftmac100_set_receive_ring_base(priv,
priv->descs_dma_addr + offsetof(struct ftmac100_descs, rxdes));
best regards,
Po-Yu Chuang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists