linux-kernel - Re: Checkpatch problem with Kconfig help symbol ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110121101755.GP16804@shadowen.org>
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:17:55 +0000
From:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
To:	Tapio Vihuri <tapio.vihuri@...ia.com>
Cc:	ext Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Checkpatch problem with Kconfig help symbol ?

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:19:31AM +0200, Tapio Vihuri wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 10:38 +0100, ext Michal Marek wrote:
> > On 20.1.2011 09:06, WANG Cong wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:42:48 +0200, Tapio Vihuri wrote:
> > > 
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> Is this false positive ?
> > >>
> > >> WARNING: please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol fully
> > >> #60: FILE: drivers/input/misc/Kconfig:159: +       help
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Interesting enough, also:
> > >>
> > >> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --file drivers/input/misc/Kconfig WARNING:
> > >> please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol fully #430:
> > >> FILE: input/misc/Kconfig:430:
> > >> +       help
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> But this is different line.
> > >>
> > > 
> > > Seems yes, the Kconfig part of your patch looks fine.
> > 
> > The check is complaining that the help text is too short:
> > 
> > +config ECI_CTRL_DEBUG
> > +	bool "ECI controller debug"
> > +	depends on INPUT_ECI_AT20
> > +	help
> > +	  Say Y here to enable debugging messages for ECI controller driver.
> > 
> > Michal
> 
> Hi.
> 
> That I suspect, and I tried to add four lines more.
> But it still complain the same.

If you have a patch which has four or more lines and trips this message
it is false yes.  Please do send me your example, as my current tests
pass.

-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/