[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101211244450.15692@router.home>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:46:32 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 1/4] Generic support for
this_cpu_cmpxchg_double
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> What is the problem with passing 128-bit structures by value? I'm quite sure *that* is okay.
You mentioned that earlier and I tried to pass 128 bit structures. My
compiler did not do any of that (gcc 4.4.5). Could come up with
some example code to make yourself certain?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists