[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110122123840.GA30830@riccoc20.at.omicron.at>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 13:38:40 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...ux.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 08/13] posix clocks: cleanup the CLOCK_DISPTACH macro
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 06:03:24PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > int posix_cpu_clock_getres(const clockid_t which_clock, struct timespec *ts);
> > int posix_cpu_clock_get(const clockid_t which_clock, struct timespec *ts);
> > -int posix_cpu_clock_set(const clockid_t which_clock, const struct timespec *ts);
> > +int posix_cpu_clock_set(const clockid_t which_clock, struct timespec *ts);
>
> Shouldn't we change the clock_set function to have *ts const in all places ?
The common_clock_set function calls:
do_sys_settimeofday
security_settime
cap_settime
do_settimeofday
so all their signatures must also change.
Should I add that into my patch set?
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists