[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110121162325.c3b513bf.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:23:25 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: Fix warnings when PM is disabled for BD2802
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:38:37 -0800 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> > That rather sucks. It leaves an all-zeroes instance of dev_pm_ops
> > uselessly bloating the driver.
>
> It is per-driver, not per device so do we really care?
We care about everything. If the objective was to make life easier for
ourselves, we'd all be on the golf course.
> > And it leaves
> > bd2802_i2c_driver.driver.pm pointing at that all-zeroes instance of
> > dev_pm_ops, which is rather dangerous.
>
> Nothing dagerous here - PM core deals with half-filled pm_ops just fine.
>
> >
> > If CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n, the .driver.pm field shouldn't exist at all.
>
> Meh, we have _waaay_ too many config options, I'd rather see CONFIG_PM
> and possibly CONFIG_PM_SLEEP go, maybe leaving us with
> CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME and maybe not. How many devices out there do not want
> PM?
Don't know. How do we determine this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists