[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinadcirsSEA7vsnYfw=KGKppUu=TtQQOWmLCFZ4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 00:13:47 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@...gle.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
davidb@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Nexus One Support
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>> Usually even "shitty git trees" have value in the history for people
>> who're interested why the code is the way it is. But as people who
>> actually looked at the patches, it doesn't apply here.
>
> Thomas posted how the android tree commits looks. How about getting a
> clue before posting more useless noise in this thread?
Oh, don't you even try to "pull a Christoph" on me! I did see Thomas'
and Russell's comments about the quality of the tree which is why I
said "it doesn't apply here" (that the history is useless).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists