[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae2cc2e9-6516-4acf-bfad-5b6947ef11c4@email.android.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 10:00:30 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 1/4] Generic support for this_cpu_cmpxchg_double
Don't apply "packed" to a structure which needs padding! That's just user error.
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
>* Tejun Heo (tj@...nel.org) wrote:
>[...]
>> > (note: packed here along with "aligned" does _not_ generate ugly
>> > bytewise read/write memory ops like "packed" alone. The use of
>> > "packed" is to let the compiler down-align the structure to the
>> > value requested, instead of uselessly aligning it on 32-byte if it
>> > chooses to.)
>>
>> Yeah, good point. :-)
>
>For the records, I just noticed that "packed, aligned(8)" can generate
>unaligned
>accesses on sparc64 by removing the padding between a "int" and a
>following
>pointer. So we should not use it.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Mathieu
>
>--
>Mathieu Desnoyers
>Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
>EfficiOS Inc.
>http://www.efficios.com
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon any lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists