[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikstr=vY=1S7A4Pudg3u=k4eJ7HRz6tWwAq4N-v@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 08:14:57 +0800
From: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] ACPI: Fixes and cleanups related to iomaps management
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> On Saturday, January 22, 2011, Jeff Chua wrote:
>> 2011/1/22 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>:
>> > On Saturday, January 22, 2011, Jeff Chua wrote:
>>
>> > means that my patch [11/11] _and_ the replacement are totally wrong, because you have
>> > _multiple_ NVS regions. That really helped, thanks a lot.
>>
>> Would it be different if I offline all CPUs before suspending to ram?
>> It seems to help with suspending to disk.
>
> No, that doesn't matter. NVS regions are just sitting there regardless of
> what happens at run time.
Strange. If I didn't offline, it hanged during suspend even without
thinkpad_acpi. I could see that the suspend code does the offline
automatically, but executing the offline before calling suspend makes
it no hanging.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists