[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110124101955.GV2232@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:19:55 +0100
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] memcg : remove ugly vairable initialization by
callers
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 03:50:51PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> This is a promised one.
> ==
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>
> This patch is for removing initialization in caller of memory cgroup
> function. Some memory cgroup uses following style to bring the result
> of start function to the end function for avoiding races.
>
> mem_cgroup_start_A(&(*ptr))
> /* Something very complicated can happen here. */
> mem_cgroup_end_A(*ptr)
>
> In some calls, *ptr should be initialized to NULL be caller. But
> it's ugly. This patch fixes that *ptr is initialized by _start
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Nitpick: I would remove the comments above the *ptr = NULL lines,
there should be no assumptions about the consequences in the caller
(the next patch will change the caller, and then the comments are
nothing but confusing). It's just a plain initialization of a return
value.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists