[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110124153109.GA970@dumpdata.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:31:09 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>,
Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
"keir.fraser@...citrix.com" <keir.fraser@...citrix.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"sliakh.lkml@...il.com" <sliakh.lkml@...il.com>,
"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"ak@....de" <ak@....de>, "davej@...hat.com" <davej@...hat.com>,
"jiang@...ncsu.edu" <jiang@...ncsu.edu>,
"arjan@...radead.org" <arjan@...radead.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>, konrad@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/security] x86: Add NX protection for kernel data
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 03:27:39PM +0100, matthieu castet wrote:
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :
> >On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:41:54PM +0100, matthieu castet wrote:
> >>Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :
> >>>>- * .data and .bss should always be writable.
> >>>>+ * .data and .bss should always be writable, but xen won't like
> >>>>+ * if we make page table rw (that live in .data or .bss)
> >>>> */
> >>>>+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> >>>> if (within(address, (unsigned long)_sdata, (unsigned long)_edata) ||
> >>>>- within(address, (unsigned long)__bss_start, (unsigned long)__bss_stop))
> >>>>- pgprot_val(required) |= _PAGE_RW;
> >>>>+ within(address, (unsigned long)__bss_start, (unsigned long)__bss_stop)) {
> >>>>+ unsigned int level;
> >>>>+ if (lookup_address(address, &level) && (level != PG_LEVEL_4K))
> >>>>+ pgprot_val(forbidden) |= _PAGE_RW;
> >>>>+ }
> >>>>+#endif
> >>>> #if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA)
> >>>>
> >>>>fyi, it does make it boot.
> >>>Hold it.. ccache is a wonderful tool but I think I've just "rebuilt" the
> >>>binaries with the .bss HPAGE_ALIGN aligment by mistake, so this path got never
> >>>taken.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Ok,
> >>
> >>ATM I saw the following solution to solve the problem :
> >>1) remove the data/bss check in static_protections, it was introduced by NX patches (64edc8ed). But I am not sure it
> >>is really needed anymore.
> >>2) add ". = ALIGN(HPAGE_SIZE)" somewhere after init section. But if we want not to be allocated in image we
> >>should put it before bss. And if we want to be freed after init, we should put before .init.end.
> >>This mean moving .smp_locks (and .data_nosave when x86 will be added) before init section. I have no idea of the impact.
> >>3) add some logic in arch/x86/xen/mmu.c, that will ignore RW page setting for the page table marked RO.
> >>4) make static_protections take and old_prot argument, and only apply RW .data/.bss requirement if page is already RW.
> >>
> >>If possible I will go for 1).
> >
> >Sounds good. Just send me the patch and I will test it.
>
> Ok, what give you the attached patch.
>
> I don't know if I should give the printk or not.
I would say get rid of the printk. It does not really help the users. Here is an excerpt of
2.6.38-rc2 with this patch:
7.247448] NX-protecting the kernel data: 2412k
[ 7.252489] RO page for 0xc15a0000 in bss/data.
[ 7.253052] RO page for 0xc15a1000 in bss/data.
[ 7.253052] RO page for 0xc15a3000 in bss/data.
[ 7.365104] mv used greatest stack depth: 6616 bytes left
So Tested-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
(I tested on baremetal x86,x86_64 and Xen x86 and x86_64)
>
>
> Matthieu
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
> index 8b830ca..eec93c5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
> @@ -256,7 +256,6 @@ static inline pgprot_t static_protections(pgprot_t prot, unsigned long address,
> unsigned long pfn)
> {
> pgprot_t forbidden = __pgprot(0);
> - pgprot_t required = __pgprot(0);
>
> /*
> * The BIOS area between 640k and 1Mb needs to be executable for
> @@ -283,11 +282,13 @@ static inline pgprot_t static_protections(pgprot_t prot, unsigned long address,
> __pa((unsigned long)__end_rodata) >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> pgprot_val(forbidden) |= _PAGE_RW;
> /*
> - * .data and .bss should always be writable.
> + * .data and .bss should always be writable, but xen won't like
> + * if we make page table rw (that live in .data or .bss)
> */
> if (within(address, (unsigned long)_sdata, (unsigned long)_edata) ||
> within(address, (unsigned long)__bss_start, (unsigned long)__bss_stop))
> - pgprot_val(required) |= _PAGE_RW;
> + if ((pgprot_val(prot) & _PAGE_RW) == 0)
> + printk(KERN_INFO "RO page for 0x%lx in bss/data.\n", address);
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA)
> /*
> @@ -327,7 +328,6 @@ static inline pgprot_t static_protections(pgprot_t prot, unsigned long address,
> #endif
>
> prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) & ~pgprot_val(forbidden));
> - prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | pgprot_val(required));
>
> return prot;
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists