[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110124170458.GA31066@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:04:58 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: sysrq -- ensure sysrq_enabled and
__sysrq_enabled are consistent
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:06:12PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Currently sysrq_enabled and __sysrq_enabled are initialised separatly
> and inconsitantly, leading to sysrq being actually enabled by reported
> as not enabled in sysfs. The first change to the sysfs configurable
> synchronises these two:
>
> static int __read_mostly sysrq_enabled = 1;
> static int __sysrq_enabled;
>
> Add a common define to carry the default for these preventing them becoming
> out of sync again. Default this to 1 to mirror previous behaviour.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Applied and will also tag for stable. Thank you Andy.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists