[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D3DBBC6.1000407@goop.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:49:58 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC: vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, suzuki@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kvm hypervisor : Add hypercalls to support pv-ticketlock
On 01/22/2011 06:53 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> The main question that remains is whether the PV ticketlocks are
> a large enough improvement to also merge those. I expect they
> will be, and we'll see so in the benchmark numbers.
The pathological worst-case of ticket locks in a virtual environment
isn't very hard to hit, so I expect they'll make a huge difference
there. On lightly loaded systems (little or no CPU overcommit) then
they should be close to a no-op.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists