lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:13:06 +0100
From:	Tobias Karnat <tobias.karnat@...glemail.com>
To:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc:	richard.coe@....ge.com, jslaby@...ell.com,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: acpi_button: random oops on boot

Am Montag, den 24.01.2011, 14:03 +0100 schrieb Thomas Renninger:
> Aren't there some memory corruption checkers which can
> additionally be enabled?
> 
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB
> Say Y here to have the kernel do limited verification on memory
> allocation as well as poisoning memory on free to catch use of freed
> memory. This can make kmalloc/kfree-intensive workloads much slower.
> 
> CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> Enable this to turn on extended checks in the virtual-memory system
> that may impact performance.
> 
> CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST
> Enable this to turn on extended checks in the linked-list
> walking routines.
> 
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> Unmap pages from the kernel linear mapping after free_pages().
> This results in a large slowdown, but helps to find certain types
> of memory corruption.
> 
> Did I oversee one?
> 
> Not sure which is best, it should not hurt to turn on all
> (if possible) for a test.
> 
>     Thomas

I would like to help, but I don't have another pc here, which I could
connect over serial. And when it crashes on boot, there is never a call
trace to see.

I hope Rich is still interested in a solution as I am. The bad thing is
that the latest working version I had been running on that machine was
ancient 2.6.23. So this problem is a regression, which I would have
noticed earlier, if I had updated that machine more often.

It is not an hardware problem, I have edac enabled and I don't see any
errors. The only strange thing I get related to memory is an mtrr entry
of 64GB (I only have 6GB).

-Tobias

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ