[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110124200515.GA30963@albatros>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 23:05:17 +0300
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Cc: Ryan Mallon <ryan@...ewatersys.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c: Add missing IS_ERR test
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 21:00 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>
> > On 01/25/2011 08:55 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ void __init at91_clock_associate(const char *id, struct device *dev, const char
> > > {
> > > struct clk *clk = clk_get(NULL, id);
> > >
> > > - if (!dev || !clk || !IS_ERR(clk_get(dev, func)))
> > > + if (!dev || IS_ERR(clk) || !IS_ERR(clk_get(dev, func)))
> > > return;
> >
> > I think we want:
> >
> > if (!dev || !clk || IS_ERR(clk) || !IS_ERR(clk_get(dev, func)))
> > return;
> >
> > Since it is valid to return a NULL clk, and we don't want to try and
> > dereference it if that is the case.
>
> Looking at the given defintion of clk_get, I can't see how that could
> happen:
clk_get() is defined per-architecture, sometimes it is NULL only.
> struct clk *clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
> {
> struct clk *clk;
>
> list_for_each_entry(clk, &clocks, node) {
> if (strcmp(id, clk->name) == 0)
> return clk;
> if (clk->function && (dev == clk->dev) && strcmp(id, clk->function) == 0)
> return clk;
> }
>
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> }
>
> Both paths to the non-ERR_PTR return dereference clk.
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Vasiliy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists