linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] perf fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTikGAg9KtTwiM0eago-BLvnWsWnSfuv+zBjBE6VH@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Jan 2011 07:13:28 +1000
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf fixes

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Was this on a freshly installed machine? Or on a freshly updated one?

It is. And the machine is slow too.

> Probably its the build-id collecting at the end of a session, on the
> first run you had a cold cache and it had to figure out which binaries
> to cache on ~/.debug, second time it was already cached so it was fast.

That sounds like a reasonable explanation.

So just ignore this report,

             Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/