[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1101242232590.10252@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:41:11 +0100 (CET)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: x86@...nel.org
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Soren Sandmann <ssp@...hat.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] X86-64: Don't use pointer to out-of-scope variable in
dump_trace()
In arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c::dump_trace() we have this code:
...
if (!stack) {
unsigned long dummy;
stack = &dummy;
if (task && task != current)
stack = (unsigned long *)task->thread.sp;
}
bp = stack_frame(task, regs);
/*
* Print function call entries in all stacks, starting at the
* current stack address. If the stacks consist of nested
* exceptions
*/
tinfo = task_thread_info(task);
for (;;) {
char *id;
unsigned long *estack_end;
estack_end = in_exception_stack(cpu, (unsigned long)stack,
&used, &id);
...
You'll notice that we assign to 'stack' the address of the variable
'dummy' which is only in-scope inside the 'if (!stack)'. So when we later
access stack (at the end of the above, and assuming we did not take the
'if (task && task != current)' branch) we'll be using the address of a
variable that is no longer in scope. I believe this patch is the proper
fix, but I freely admit that I'm not 100% certain.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
---
dumpstack_64.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
compile tested only.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
index 6410133..a6b6fcf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
@@ -149,13 +149,13 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task,
unsigned used = 0;
struct thread_info *tinfo;
int graph = 0;
+ unsigned long dummy;
unsigned long bp;
if (!task)
task = current;
if (!stack) {
- unsigned long dummy;
stack = &dummy;
if (task && task != current)
stack = (unsigned long *)task->thread.sp;
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists