[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=gRO0tCdEzmn3Ne6Wj6bXd1G8nhLw2E_-Yw3WA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:54:00 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mfwitten@...il.com,
christian@...dbynature.de, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] sched: fix autogroup nice tune on UP
Hi!
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com> wrote:
> +static void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, long weight_delta)
> +{
> + struct task_group *tg;
> + struct sched_entity *se;
> +
> + if (!cfs_rq)
> + return;
> +
> + tg = cfs_rq->tg;
> + se = tg->se[0];
> + if (!se)
> + return;
> + if (likely(se->load.weight == tg->shares))
> + return;
> + reweight_entity(cfs_rq_of(se), se, tg->shares);
> +}
Wouldn't it be cleaner if we'd separate the shares calculation in a
separate helper function that's just
return tg->shares;
for UP and extract the current logic for the SMP version?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists