[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D3E1A08.5060303@teksavvy.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:32:08 -0500
From: Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils
?
On 11-01-24 12:54 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:03:47PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>> As of the 2.6.36 kernel, the userspace commands lsinput and input-kbd
>> no longer work. And if I grab newer/patched versions of those from the latest
>> Ubuntu 10.10, then those newer/patched versions do not work with kernels
>> *before* 2.6.36.
>>
>> At first glance, this looks like a visible regression.
>> Is there a version of input-utils that works with both
>> old and new kernels ?
>>
>
> The event protocol number was updated to reflect support of large
> scancodes, unfortunately some of the utilities expected exact version
> and refuse to work with updated one.
So is there a danger of memory corruption if running a binary
that doesn't check the version number?
In other words, did the size and/or format of returned data
change for an ioctl() or something here?
If so, then that is a user-visible regression, and shouldn't happen.
One correct way to handle that, would be to create a new ioctl(),
and mark the old one as deprecated, for removal a few years later perhaps.
???
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists