linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH wq#for-2.6.38] workqueue: use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM instead of WQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110125133656.GW27510@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:36:56 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	dm-devel@...hat.com, Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wq#for-2.6.38] workqueue: use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM instead of
 WQ_RESCUER

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:01:09PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> WQ_RESCUER is now an internal flag and should only be used in the
> workqueue implementation proper.  Use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM instead.
> 
> This doesn't introduce any functional difference.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: dm-devel@...hat.com
> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>

Applied to wq#for-2.6.39 sans the redundant gfs2 part.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/