linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2][concept RFC] x86: BIOS-save kernel log to disk upon panic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110125170522.GA16285@laptop>
Date:	Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:05:22 +0200
From:	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, X86-ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Willy Tarreau <wtarreau@...a.kernel.org>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@...radead.org>,
	Dirk.Hohndel@...el.com, IDE-ML <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2][concept RFC] x86: BIOS-save kernel log to disk
	upon panic

Hi!

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:02:35AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 17:36 +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > The complete __roadblock__ I'm currently facing though is restoring the disk
> > controllers to the state originally setup by the BIOS Power-on self-test (POST).
> > I hope such re-initialization is even technically feasible.
> > 
> > Without such re-initialization, we'll just be risking the BIOS code exploding.
> > That was the case in the 5-minute hang described in the cover sheet (PATCH #0).
> 
> So this is the bit that's not really technically feasible.  BIOS tends
> to run storage devices in a very primitive way (so it takes basic
> settings, for example and sets the device up for one particular channel
> of access).  When preparing the device for an operating system, we have
> to blow away all the bios stuff and put it into a more generally
> performant mode (this isn't just the storage per se, it's also the
> interrupt and routing).  Unfortunately, currently, we don't bother to
> save the settings the BIOS was using, so there's no way to reinitialise
> the device back to bios without an effective reboot.
>

My current x86 laptop includes the very common ATA PIIX controller. If I
dumped the PIC, IOAPIC, and disk controller state in a register file in a
safe area, and re-initialized these before giving control to the BIOS, can
this move the solution space from being not really technically feasible to
"quite possible"?

I have to admit that my knowledge of disk controllers is nil. The final
result though can really be worth the effort (as stated by Ingo's mail),
so I'm _willing_ to explore and prototype different paths.

>
> Most BIOS doesn't seem to contain storage re-POST code that's usable
> (it's all embedded in the boot sequence).
>

There's this arcane `Warm boot with partial re-initialization' BIOS feature
using the CMOS register 0xf, but I don't want to to depend on it either.

> James
> 

Thanks,

-- 
Darwish
http://darwish.07.googlepages.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/