linux-kernel - Re: more dput lock contentions in 2.6.38-rc?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1295919258.1949.973.camel@sli10-conroe>
Date:	Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:34:18 +0800
From:	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc:	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
	"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: more dput lock contentions in 2.6.38-rc?

On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 09:26 +0800, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 09:04 +0800, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> > we are testing dbench benchmark and see big drop of 2.6.38-rc compared
> >> > to 2.6.37 in several machines with 2 sockets or 4 sockets. We have 12
> >> > disks mount to /mnt/stp/dbenchdata/sd*/ and dbench runs against data of
> >> > the disks. According to perf, we saw more lock contentions:
> >> > In 2.6.37: 13.00%        dbench  [kernel.kallsyms]   [k] _raw_spin_lock
> >> > In 2.6.38-rc: 69.45%        dbench  [kernel.kallsyms]   [k]_raw_spin_lock
> >> > -     69.45%        dbench  [kernel.kallsyms]   [k] _raw_spin_lock
> >> >   - _raw_spin_lock
> >> >      - 48.41% dput
> >> >         - 61.17% path_put
> >> >            - 60.47% do_path_lookup
> >> >               + 53.18% user_path_at
> >> >               + 42.13% do_filp_open
> >> >               + 4.69% user_path_parent
> >>
> >> What filesystems are mounted on the path?
> > ext3 or ext4
> 
> ext3 or 4 along every step of the path? Are there
> any acls loaded, or security policy running?
all disks are formated with the same fs, just some machines use ext3 and
others ext4. no we don't have acl or security policy.
> It may be possible that they're all coming from
> /proc/ access.
I added trace in dput just after the lock taken. and most files are '/',
'mnt', 'stp'. the percentage of 'proc' is small actually.

Thanks,
Shaohua

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/