[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110125194416.GB3041@mgebm.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:44:16 -0700
From: Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Cc: dwg@....ibm.com, mel@....ul.ie, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hughd@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hugepage: Allow parallelization of the hugepage
fault path
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> From: David Gibson <dwg@....ibm.com>
>
> At present, the page fault path for hugepages is serialized by a
> single mutex. This is used to avoid spurious out-of-memory conditions
> when the hugepage pool is fully utilized (two processes or threads can
> race to instantiate the same mapping with the last hugepage from the
> pool, the race loser returning VM_FAULT_OOM). This problem is
> specific to hugepages, because it is normal to want to use every
> single hugepage in the system - with normal pages we simply assume
> there will always be a few spare pages which can be used temporarily
> until the race is resolved.
>
> Unfortunately this serialization also means that clearing of hugepages
> cannot be parallelized across multiple CPUs, which can lead to very
> long process startup times when using large numbers of hugepages.
>
> This patch improves the situation by replacing the single mutex with a
> table of mutexes, selected based on a hash of the address_space and
> file offset being faulted (or mm and virtual address for MAP_PRIVATE
> mappings).
>
>
> From: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
>
> Forward ported and made a few changes:
>
> - Use the Jenkins hash to scatter the hash, better than using just the
> low bits.
>
> - Always round num_fault_mutexes to a power of two to avoid an expensive
> modulus in the hash calculation.
>
> I also tested this patch on a 64 thread POWER6 box using a simple parallel
> fault testcase:
>
> http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/parallel_fault.c
>
> Command line options:
>
> parallel_fault <nr_threads> <size in kB> <skip in kB>
>
> First the time taken to fault 48GB of 16MB hugepages:
> # time hugectl --heap ./parallel_fault 1 50331648 16384
> 11.1 seconds
>
> Now the same test with 64 concurrent threads:
> # time hugectl --heap ./parallel_fault 64 50331648 16384
> 8.8 seconds
>
> Hardly any speedup. Finally the 64 concurrent threads test with this patch
> applied:
> # time hugectl --heap ./parallel_fault 64 50331648 16384
> 0.7 seconds
>
> We go from 8.8 seconds to 0.7 seconds, an improvement of 12.6x.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <dwg@....ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists