| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1295985978.25496.35.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:06:18 -0800 From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org> To: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org> Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] msm: Add CPU queries On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 11:45 -0800, David Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25 2011, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 11:17 -0800, David Brown wrote: > > > I suggesting we do it across the board because consistency is a good > > thing .. It also allows us to use 8x60 when 8660 and 8960 are actually > > similar .. You can't deny that 8960 is similar to 8660 because your > > patches show some duplication due to it. > > You're completely missing the point of these tests. If _anything_ is > different, the macros need to be different. I don't care if they're > similar, I need to know when they are different. That is the point of > the macros. I said you would have macros specifically for 8660 and 8960, so if you need to know when they're different then you have macro's to do that. Daniel -- Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists