[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110126024831.GD28283@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:48:31 +0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@...gle.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, San Mehat <san@...gle.com>,
Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] Add oops notification chain.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 02:21:03PM -0800, Aaron Durbin wrote:
> As Mike talked about it might be more desirable to actually pass a
> reason field that indicates the appropriate kernel event. However, the
> naming of some of the variables becomes less clear. Maybe name it
> panic_oops_notifier_list? That way there would only be a single
> notifier chain.
Yes, I think that's the better thing to do here instead of adding more
notifier chains. It would just start to get even messier than it
currently is :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists