[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-ccaa8d657117bb1876d471bd91579d774106778d@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:00:41 GMT
From: tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, arnd@...db.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:core/locking] rtmutex-tester: Remove BKL tests
Commit-ID: ccaa8d657117bb1876d471bd91579d774106778d
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/ccaa8d657117bb1876d471bd91579d774106778d
Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
AuthorDate: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:17:32 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:58:12 +0100
rtmutex-tester: Remove BKL tests
The BKL is going away, no need to test it any more.
I left the definitions of the test case numbers
in, so that the other tests do not get renumbered.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <1295993854-4971-19-git-send-email-arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/rtmutex-tester.c | 39 ++++-----------------------------------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex-tester.c b/kernel/rtmutex-tester.c
index 66cb89b..d5b5435 100644
--- a/kernel/rtmutex-tester.c
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex-tester.c
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/sysdev.h>
#include <linux/timer.h>
@@ -27,7 +26,6 @@ struct test_thread_data {
int opcode;
int opdata;
int mutexes[MAX_RT_TEST_MUTEXES];
- int bkl;
int event;
struct sys_device sysdev;
};
@@ -46,8 +44,8 @@ enum test_opcodes {
RTTEST_LOCKINTNOWAIT, /* 6 Lock interruptible no wait in wakeup, data = lockindex */
RTTEST_LOCKCONT, /* 7 Continue locking after the wakeup delay */
RTTEST_UNLOCK, /* 8 Unlock, data = lockindex */
- RTTEST_LOCKBKL, /* 9 Lock BKL */
- RTTEST_UNLOCKBKL, /* 10 Unlock BKL */
+ RTTEST_LOCKBKL, /* 9 Was: Lock BKL */
+ RTTEST_UNLOCKBKL, /* 10 Was: Unlock BKL */
RTTEST_SIGNAL, /* 11 Signal other test thread, data = thread id */
RTTEST_RESETEVENT = 98, /* 98 Reset event counter */
RTTEST_RESET = 99, /* 99 Reset all pending operations */
@@ -74,13 +72,6 @@ static int handle_op(struct test_thread_data *td, int lockwakeup)
td->mutexes[i] = 0;
}
}
-
- if (!lockwakeup && td->bkl == 4) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL
- unlock_kernel();
-#endif
- td->bkl = 0;
- }
return 0;
case RTTEST_RESETEVENT:
@@ -131,25 +122,6 @@ static int handle_op(struct test_thread_data *td, int lockwakeup)
td->mutexes[id] = 0;
return 0;
- case RTTEST_LOCKBKL:
- if (td->bkl)
- return 0;
- td->bkl = 1;
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL
- lock_kernel();
-#endif
- td->bkl = 4;
- return 0;
-
- case RTTEST_UNLOCKBKL:
- if (td->bkl != 4)
- break;
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL
- unlock_kernel();
-#endif
- td->bkl = 0;
- return 0;
-
default:
break;
}
@@ -196,7 +168,6 @@ void schedule_rt_mutex_test(struct rt_mutex *mutex)
td->event = atomic_add_return(1, &rttest_event);
break;
- case RTTEST_LOCKBKL:
default:
break;
}
@@ -229,8 +200,6 @@ void schedule_rt_mutex_test(struct rt_mutex *mutex)
td->event = atomic_add_return(1, &rttest_event);
return;
- case RTTEST_LOCKBKL:
- return;
default:
return;
}
@@ -380,11 +349,11 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_test_status(struct sys_device *dev, struct sysdev_attribute
spin_lock(&rttest_lock);
curr += sprintf(curr,
- "O: %4d, E:%8d, S: 0x%08lx, P: %4d, N: %4d, B: %p, K: %d, M:",
+ "O: %4d, E:%8d, S: 0x%08lx, P: %4d, N: %4d, B: %p, M:",
td->opcode, td->event, tsk->state,
(MAX_RT_PRIO - 1) - tsk->prio,
(MAX_RT_PRIO - 1) - tsk->normal_prio,
- tsk->pi_blocked_on, td->bkl);
+ tsk->pi_blocked_on);
for (i = MAX_RT_TEST_MUTEXES - 1; i >=0 ; i--)
curr += sprintf(curr, "%d", td->mutexes[i]);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists