[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x491v3zzkzz.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:29:36 -0500
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
linux-aio@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 21/32] fs/aio: aio_wq isn't used in memory reclaim path
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> writes:
> aio_wq isn't used during memory reclaim. Convert to alloc_workqueue()
> without WQ_MEM_RECLAIM. It's possible to use system_wq but given that
> the number of work items is determined from userland and the work item
> may block, enforcing strict concurrency limit would be a good idea.
>
> Also, move fput_work to system_wq so that aio_wq is used soley to
> throttle the max concurrency of aio work items and fput_work doesn't
> interact with other work items.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
> Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
You actually missed that CC. ;-)
> Cc: linux-aio@...ck.org
> ---
> Patch description updated to describe fput_work change. If there's no
> further objection, I'll push it through workqueue#for-2.6.39. Thanks.
Looks good to me, based on not changing existing semantics.
Acked-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists