[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D411C69.8080503@coly.li>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:19:05 +0800
From: Coly Li <i@...y.li>
To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] use BUG_ON correctly
On 2011年01月27日 14:20, Yong Zhang Wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Coly Li<i@...y.li> wrote:
>> On 2011年01月27日 14:07, Yong Zhang Wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Coly Li<i@...y.li> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2011年01月27日 10:02, Yong Zhang Wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Coly Li<bosong.ly@...bao.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BUG_ON() already uses unlikely() inside its definition if possible,
>>>>>
>>>>> It's true for asm-generic/bug.h.
>>>>>
>>>>> But for archs which has defined HAVE_ARCH_BUG,
>>>>> unlikely() is not always included in it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> IMHO, if this condition happens, it should be a bug of the arch
>>>> implementation,
>>>
>>> So that means we should fix that first :)
>>>
>>
>> Could you please to identify a piece of kernel code which provides an
>> example as the condition you mentioned ?
>> So I can have a look firstly.
>
> # line filename / context / line
> 1 35 arch/mips/include/asm/bug.h<<HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON>>
> #define HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON
> 2 115 arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h<<HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON>>
> #define HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON
I don't find arch dependent implementation of BUG_ON from the above files. Do I miss something ?
--
Coly Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists