lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110127002802.GF4981@outflux.net>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:28:02 -0800
From:	Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
	Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
	Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use %pK for /proc/kallsyms and /proc/modules

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 04:15:09PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 10:10 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Note that when compiling with -Wformat, these harmless warnings will
> > be emitted, and can be ignored:
> >   warning: '0' flag used with ā€˜%pā€™ gnu_printf format
> 
> > diff --git a/kernel/kallsyms.c b/kernel/kallsyms.c
> []
> > @@ -477,11 +477,11 @@ static int s_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
> >  		 */
> >  		type = iter->exported ? toupper(iter->type) :
> >  					tolower(iter->type);
> > -		seq_printf(m, "%0*lx %c %s\t[%s]\n",
> > +		seq_printf(m, "%0*pK %c %s\t[%s]\n",
> >  			   (int)(2 * sizeof(void *)),
> >  			   iter->value, type, iter->name, iter->module_name);
> 
> You can change this to
> 
> 		seq_printf(m, "%pK %c %s\t[%s]\n",
>   			   iter->value, type, iter->name, iter->module_name);
> 
> as that's the normal size.
> 
> Presto.  No warnings.  Same output.

Ah-ha! I was comparing against POSIX %p, which doesn't zeropad. The
kernel's %p does, so that's perfect! Yay, no warnings. Thanks! I'll send an
updated patch.

-- 
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ