[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1296134447.2614.5.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:20:47 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-x25@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x25: remove the BKL
Le jeudi 27 janvier 2011 à 13:38 +0100, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> diff --git a/net/x25/x25_out.c b/net/x25/x25_out.c
> index d00649f..f1a6ff1 100644
> --- a/net/x25/x25_out.c
> +++ b/net/x25/x25_out.c
> @@ -68,8 +68,11 @@ int x25_output(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> frontlen = skb_headroom(skb);
>
> while (skb->len > 0) {
> - if ((skbn = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, frontlen + max_len,
> - noblock, &err)) == NULL){
> + release_sock(sk);
> + skbn = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, frontlen + max_len,
> + 1, &err);
> + lock_sock(sk);
> + if (!skbn) {
> if (err == -EWOULDBLOCK && noblock){
> kfree_skb(skb);
> return sent;
This part looks strange :
noblock variable became "const 1 : NOBLOCK"
Why releasing socket if you dont block in sock_alloc_send_skb() ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists