linux-kernel - Re: One (possible) x86 get_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4D419416020000780002ECB7@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:49:42 +0000
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...ell.com>
To:	"Xiaowei Yang" <xiaowei.yang@...wei.com>,
	"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Cc:	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	<fanhenglong@...wei.com>, "Kaushik Barde" <kbarde@...wei.com>,
	"Kenneth Lee" <liguozhu@...wei.com>,
	"linqaingmin" <linqiangmin@...wei.com>, <wangzhenguo@...wei.com>,
	"Wu Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: One (possible) x86 get_user_pages bug

>>> On 27.01.11 at 14:05, Xiaowei Yang <xiaowei.yang@...wei.com> wrote:
> We created a scenario to reproduce the bug:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> // proc1/proc1.2 are 2 threads sharing one page table.
> // proc1 is the parent of proc2.
> 
> proc1               proc2          proc1.2
> ...                 ...            // in gup_pte_range()
> ...                 ...            pte = gup_get_pte()
> ...                 ...            page1 = pte_page(pte)  // (1)
> do_wp_page(page1)   ...            ...
> ...                 exit_map()     ...
> ...                 ...            get_page(page1)        // (2)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> do_wp_page() and exit_map() cause page1 to be released into free list 
> before get_page() in proc1.2 is called. The longer the delay between 
> (1)&(2), the easier the BUG_ON shows.

The scenario indeed seems to apply independent of virtualization,
but the window obviously can be unbounded unless running
native.

However, going through all the comments in gup.c again I wonder
whether pv Xen guests don't violate the major assumption: There
is talk about interrupts being off preventing (or sufficiently
deferring) remote CPUs doing TLB flushes. In pv Xen guests,
however, non-local TLB flushes do not happen by sending IPIs -
the hypercall interface gets used instead. If that's indeed the
case, I would have expected quite a few bug reports, but I'm
unaware of any - Nick, am I overlooking something here?

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/