[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1296156476.15234.246.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:27:56 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
Xiaowei Yang <xiaowei.yang@...wei.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>, fanhenglong@...wei.com,
Kaushik Barde <kbarde@...wei.com>,
Kenneth Lee <liguozhu@...wei.com>,
linqaingmin <linqiangmin@...wei.com>, wangzhenguo@...wei.com,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: One (possible) x86 get_user_pages bug
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 10:27 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> So is there some way we can preserve the current scheme's benefits while
> making it a bit more general? (If anyone else has non-IPI-based
> shootdown, it would be s390; is there some inspiration there? An
> instruction perhaps?)
Well, you can provide a xen gupf implementation based on rcu freed
page-tables like powerpc, sparc and s390 have.
But you'll have to change the mmu_gather implementation of xen and use
the get_page_unless_zero() thing mentioned before (or use
page_cache_get_speculative()).
But I see no need to change the x86 implementation, if the architecture
ever changes the way it does tlb invalidation we need to change more
than just the gupf implementation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists