[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimssaeQUmvM5BTot23R-hR2PNg3D_barQsGVywi@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:31:27 -0700
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, jeremy.kerr@...onical.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.orga, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC,1/5] arm/dt: Add dt machine definition
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Milton Miller <miltonm@....com> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 about 04:44:06 -0000, Grant Likely wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
>
> needs a description ...
oops
>>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>>
>> +#define MACH_TYPE_DT 0xffffffff
>> +
>> +#define DT_MACHINE_START(_name, _namestr) \
>> +static const struct machine_desc __mach_desc_##_name \
>> + __used \
>> + __attribute__((__section__(".arch.info.init"))) = { \
>
> linux/compiler.h defines __section for this
For commonality, I duplicated what was already done for #define
MACHINE_START in this same file. However, I'm not even entirely sure
that I'm going to keep this hunk around. With some of the recent
changes to the arm-dt patches, a special DT machine id of 0xffffffff
is no longer needed. This patch may get dropped in a future posting
of this series.
g.
>
>> + .nr = MACH_TYPE_DT, \
>> + .name = _namestr,
>> +
>> #endif
>
> milton
>
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists