linux-kernel - Stability of ecryptfs over NFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTimFGGgP-YYhRmJ=RfjfZO4mLKAVYvt_jMqhBswn@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:32:11 +0530
From:	Pallavi Joseph Kalpana <pallutai@...il.com>
To:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Stability of ecryptfs over NFS

Hello,

This a question regarding stability of ecryptfs over NFS. I am posting
a question here as I observed that the ecryptfs mailing lists are not
very active.

The ecryptfs README says that stability with NFS is still under
progress. So is the problem with stability related to the stacking
model that ecryptfs is based on, or is it due to the
encryption/decryption complexity?

I tried running "ls" on a directory mounted over NFS. This works fine
for the first time but for subsequent attempts "ls" does not show any
output.

However, when I repeat the same operation over a mount over local
filesystems, ls works fine.

Is this a known problem?

Thanks,
Pallavi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/