linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] use BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D4112F1.70804@coly.li>
Date:	Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:38:41 +0800
From:	Coly Li <i@...y.li>
To:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] use BUG_ON correctly

On 2011年01月27日 14:07, Yong Zhang Wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Coly Li<i@...y.li>  wrote:
>> On 2011年01月27日 10:02, Yong Zhang Wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Coly Li<bosong.ly@...bao.com>    wrote:
>>>>
>>>> BUG_ON() already uses unlikely() inside its definition if possible,
>>>
>>> It's true for asm-generic/bug.h.
>>>
>>> But for archs which has defined HAVE_ARCH_BUG,
>>> unlikely() is not always included in it.
>>>
>>
>> IMHO, if this condition happens, it should be a bug of the arch
>> implementation,
>
> So that means we should fix that first :)
>

Could you please to identify a piece of kernel code which provides an example as the condition you mentioned ?
So I can have a look firstly.

-- 
Coly Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/