[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110128080213.GC2213@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:02:13 +0100
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH 3/4] mecg: fix oom flag at THP charge
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:27:29PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
> Thanks to Johanns and Daisuke for suggestion.
> =
> Hugepage allocation shouldn't trigger oom.
> Allocation failure is not fatal.
>
> Orignal-patch-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: mmotm-0125/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-0125.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ mmotm-0125/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2369,11 +2369,14 @@ static int mem_cgroup_charge_common(stru
> struct page_cgroup *pc;
> int ret;
> int page_size = PAGE_SIZE;
> + bool oom;
>
> if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
> page_size <<= compound_order(page);
> VM_BUG_ON(!PageTransHuge(page));
> - }
> + oom = false;
> + } else
> + oom = true;
That needs a comment. You can take the one from my patch if you like.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists