| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:28:48 +0100 From: Per Forlin <per.forlin@...aro.org> To: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com> Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mmc: add double buffering for mmc block requests Hi Jaehoon, Have you had the chance to test the patches on the Samsung Soc. I can sketch a implementation for sdhci if that helps? Unfortunately I don't have any hardware to test the SDHCI driver unless there is support in QEMU? I really think I need to test this on more hardware in order to get more results for the patchset and hopefully more attention as well. BR Per On 18 January 2011 09:12, Per Forlin <per.forlin@...aro.org> wrote: > On 18 January 2011 03:35, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com> wrote: >> Hi Per.. >> >> it is interesting approach..so >> we want to test your double buffering in our environment(Samsung SoC). >> >> Did you test with SDHCI? > So far I have only tested on mmci for board u5500 and u8500. I happily > test on a different board if I can get hold of one. > >> If you tested with SDHCI, i want to know how much increase the performance. >> >> Thanks, >> Jaehoon Chung > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists