[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1296224405.5118.8.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:20:05 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net/wireless/nl80211.c: Avoid call to
genlmsg_cancel
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:16 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > But why did you call the label differently? :)
>
> Because out is already used in this case, and I didn't want to change all
> of the other occurrences of nla_put_failure. It's a bit sloppy though,
> because this code is the actual nla_put_failure. I can change it if you
> prefer.
Oh, and I could've seen that from the patch itself too, I just missed
it, sorry.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists