[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D4228CE.5090601@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:24:14 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
CC: matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [BUG] broken ebba638ae723d8a8fc2f7abce5ec18b688b791d7
On 01/27/2011 03:00 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> Yikes, good catch.
>
> arch/x86/kernel/trampoline_64.S uses:
> movw $(trampoline_stack_end - r_base), %sp
>
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S uses:
> movl $boot_stack_end, %eax
> addl %ebp, %eax
> movl %eax, %esp
>
> what would be safe for arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S ? It uses "stack_start",
> but later after paging set-up. Is the following sane to solve this?
>
To run it before paging is set up, you can't use stack, start; you have
to use a pointer based on physical address. You have two problems with
using stack_start: you're using a linear address to access stack_start,
and stack_start itself contains a linear address.
It's not entirely clear to me why we don't initialize %ss to __BOOT_DS
with the other segment registers, but it would make most sense to me:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
index fc293dc..c10f9ba 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
@@ -99,7 +99,12 @@ ENTRY(startup_32)
movl %eax,%es
movl %eax,%fs
movl %eax,%gs
+ movl %eax,%ss
2:
+/*
+ * Set up an initial stack
+ */
+ movl $pa(init_thread_union+THREAD_SIZE), %esp
/*
* Clear BSS first so that there are no surprises...
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists